MA reinstated Yudha Arfandi after the killing

Monday, April 21, 2025 – 12:19 WIB

Jakarta, Fifa – Judges Committee at the level of cracking, rejects all the separations provided by Arbandy. He would like it the perpetrator of the murder of the son of the artist Tamara Taismar, which is Raden Ananti behind Bramudito or Dante.

It was reported through the Supreme Court website (MA), the judge rejected all the teams submitted by Yudha Arfandi.

“The prosecutor’s explanation No. refused to appeal the defendant.”

The cracking decision was implemented on Thursday, April 15, 2025. It was distributed by the appeal on Thursday 20 March 2025.

The Council of Rights, Johannes Brania, as head of the cracking judge. The members of the judges are Casava Tamma Olanta Burgan and Ashdi Citio Bodhoarsu, a replacement recorder and Anda Andreini.

“The intention of deliberate killing,” he said.

With the appeal by Arbandy, the prison sentence is still 20 years of the Judges Committee at the first level court.

“A long time ago: 27 days,” continued.

For information, Yunda Arfandi was sentenced to 20 years in prison because of his actions that claimed the life of Tamara Tissarma, the artist, Raden Ananti, Khalif Bramudito (Dante).

In fact, the Tamara Timara family hopes that Yunda Arfandi will get a more severe punishment such as life imprisonment or death penalty.

“The prosecution stated that the defendant Yunda Arfandi is legal and convincingly guilty of a crime of pre -murder, as is the case with the accusation of the first public prosecutor.”

He continued, “Improving the crime against the defendant Yuda Arfandi with a 20 -year prison sentence and the defendant ordered the survival to be held.”

The judge was completely different from the demands of the public prosecutor (the public prosecutor) who initially requested the death penalty against Ardandi. There were many considerations made by the prosecutor previously given that the death of Dante had recently proven like the killing of depths.

However, there are stressful things and dilution of this decision -making process. For example, Yunda Arfandi has been proven that he had committed a very harsh act by Dante who was still minor. Although Dante at that time he can continue to live with his family.

“The defendant had the heart to commit an act of the victim, the child, Raden Ananti, Khalif Bramodito, a child who was supposed to be protected and loved, given his close relationship with the witness Tamara Tismar, the mother of the victim of Raden Ananti,” the Judges Committee explained.