Anthonythe father of Marta del Castillo, murdered in 2009 by Miguel Carcaño, returned to the forefront of the media scene. This time for criticize the latest decision of Court of Sevillewho rejected his lawyer’s request to “clarify” the sentence that acquitted him of the crime of perjury during the trial of Francisco Javier García in 2011, known as “He Cuckoo‘, and his mother.
He did this through a publication on his personal profile of X, specifying that this decision of the Court finds its origin in “mud“and the”cronyism“which, in his opinion, exists in this instance.
“The level of mud that exists in the Court is only comparable to that left by the passage of a Dana. How is it possible that even if they plead guilty, they are acquitted. And with the arrogance that do these gods of Olympus in black robes. Cronyism is like that,” he wrote.
THE lawyer of Marta del Castillo’s parents, Inmaculada Torres, had presented a document in which she asked the first section of the court for a “complement” of its judicial resolution.
The level of mud in the Courtyard is only comparable to that left by the passage of a Dana. How is it possible that even if they plead guilty, they are acquitted?
And with the arrogance they display, these gods of Olympus in black robes. Cronyism is like that.-Antonio del Castillo (@kastillo62) November 15, 2024
Torres requested that it be stipulated that the two accused they recognizedduring the trial held against him by the Criminal Court number seven in 2011, both the facts contained in the indictment of the Prosecutor’s Office and the facts of the indictments of the family as a private accusation and of the association Victims and Justice as a popular accusation.
However, the first section of the Seville court explained in its order that “no explanation is possible to the sentence pronounced, whether in the form of correction or addition as planned, without appreciating any obscure notion, nor no omission or rectification of any unintentional clerical or arithmetic error, nor complete it.
