The president of the Generalitat Valenciana, Carlos Mazón, took this Friday a very measured speech to defend his management of DANA at the Cortes Valencianes, where he took shots at everyone and avoided self-criticism. In almost all written interventions, Mazón’s words were measured almost to the millimeter, among other things to avoid possible criminal consequences for its management.
The journalist of the Tribunales de laSexta, Alfonso Pérez Medina, explained that Mazón’s statements went in the direction of “avoiding any responsibility”, controlling each word in detail for “the consequences it could have in a possible judicial investigation “.
“It must be taken into account that if legal proceedings are finally opened, The main thing would be to be able to demonstrate or not that this delay in alerting that was sent to citizens was the direct cause of these deaths,” said Pérez Medina, speaking of the responsibility for a tragedy where everything was done wrong, causing more than 215 deaths.
The same spokesperson for Compromís, Joan Baldoví, told the head of the Consell that his speech this Friday in which he described what happened on October 29 and in which he highlighted the lack of information offered by the Júcar Hydrographic Confederation (CHJ) for alert management“This was not written to him by his advisors, but by his lawyers.” “It looked like a defense brief“, he stressed.
To this day he remembers, Around ten complaints have already been filed for reckless homicides, one of them before the Superior Court of Justice of the Valencian Community (TSJCV) against Mazón himself and the others before the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court because they are directed against the president of the central government, Pedro Sánchez , and his ministers.
Only the Supreme Court has a total of nine complaints and complaints to various authors -from Vox to anti-corruption associations and individuals- who denounce alleged crimes of omission of the duty of assistance and reckless homicide against Sánchez, the ministers Fernando Grande-Marlaska, Margarita Robles and Teresa Ribera, Mazón and the Valencian executive in general.
Added to this are two actions administrative-contentious before the High Court, the one signed by a Valencian lawyer who sued Sánchez and Grande-Marlaska for their “obvious inactivity” before the DANA and another presented by Liberum before the TSJCV – which he referred to the TS – against the Government Delegation and the Executive of Sánchez for “non-compliance with their legal obligations”.
