Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, chief of staff of Madrid President Isabel Díaz Ayuso, assured on the social network an alleged revelation of secrets that, according to him, the prosecution would have committed by denying a hoax published by the newspaper El Mundo. The origin of the case comes from Ayuso’s own chief of staff, who, a few hours after elDiario.es revealed the tax fraud of the partner of the president of Madrid, the businessman Alberto González Amador, disclosed from telephone with which he communicates with the press from the Community of Madrid informed various media that the prosecution had proposed to the president’s partner to plead guilty. The newspaper El Mundo was the first to publish this information, which was then reproduced in other media which added another part of Rodríguez’s message which implied that the prosecutor’s agreement had been stopped by “orders of up “.
El Mundo and other publications gave credibility to the amputated email that Rodríguez sent to various editorial offices, but which was in reality the response to a previous one sent almost a month earlier to the prosecutor’s office in which the partner d’Ayuso, through a lawyer, admitted two crimes of tax evasion and tried to agree on a sentence that did not involve his entry into prison. The first email, the one that Ayuso’s defense partner Miguel Ángel Rodríguez and media outlets like The Objective and Libertad Digital have not published, was written by Alberto González Amador’s lawyers for the prosecution and began as follows: “There are certainly two crimes committed against the Public Treasury”. The email was sent to a generic Madrid prosecutor’s email address on February 2, a month and ten days before eldiario.es exclusively revealed the tax fraud. And long before Ayuso said it was the Treasury that owed her partner money and tried to attribute a conspiracy of state powers against the person she lives with in a luxury apartment bought from months after the Treasury deception and after a millionaire hit in the purchase of masks.
A few hours after these media published the distorted version of Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, the prosecution issued a statement with a timeline, which clearly indicated that the proposal for an agreement to agree on a sentence came from Ayuso’s partner, after several years of investigation into the Tax Agency.
Despite the fact that the first publication of the emails between the prosecution and González Amador’s lawyer came from the defense of Ayuso’s partner, who sent them to Miguel Ángel Rodríguez to distribute them, amputated and as s ‘this was the first communication and not In response to a precedent, among some related media, Ayuso’s partner decided to go to the prosecution for revealing secrets.
Once the complaint was filed against the Madrid Public Prosecutor’s Office for disseminating the note, the Attorney General of the State, Álvaro García Ortiz, decided to take responsibility for this statement, so that the only court competent to judge it is the Supreme Court. In a reasoned statement, the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid requested the continuation of the investigation and the case is now in the hands of a chamber of the Supreme Court which has on the table a document from the Public Ministry in which it opposes the imputation. of its maximum representative.
In this context, Ayuso’s chief of staff, who had already predicted a few weeks ago that the attorney general would end up in prison in another tweet, now assures that García Ortiz will be charged. He did this in a chain of messages against Pedro Sánchez and his wife, and after the new Minister of Digital Transition, Óscar López, responded to Rodríguez that he had the wrong family member, alluding to the president of Madrid and his confessed fraudster boyfriend.
The response from Ayuso’s chief of staff was another tweet in which he assured: “Tomorrow it is the turn of the Sanchismo prosecutor”, which implies that he has information on the decision that must rule on the indictment of the Attorney General, who has already been transferred to his team. who does not plan to resign even if the Supreme Court decides to investigate him.
