The magistrate, one of the accused, warns of the “serious irregularity” that occurred in the composition of the court that resolved Campo’s abstention
“The Plenary Court was established irregularly since the challenged magistrates participated before the disputes were resolved (…). My participation occurred against my criteria and by decision of the Plenary itself.” This is what the magistrate assures…
Session limit reached
- Access to Premium content is open through the institution you are in, but there are currently too many users logged in at the same time. Please try again after a few minutes.
try again
You have exceeded the session limit
- You can only start three sessions at a time. We closed the oldest session so you can continue browsing the rest without limits.
Continue browsing
Article reserved for subscribers
Report a bug
