The apocalypse that threatened Valencia on October 29 monopolized, as it could not be otherwise, the news of our country. It is normal for the media to focus on a tragedy which cost the lives of more than 200 compatriots, left hundreds injured, left thousands homeless, damaged 100,000 cars and caused losses of 30 billion euros. . A disaster which will forever mark the lives of hundreds of thousands of Valencians and which will not be forgotten for at least two or three generations.
There is DANA morning, afternoon and evening. DANA Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday. DANA 24/365. And I think that’s a very good thing because, thanks to serious media, politicians will continue to step up to the plate. The day they leave Paiporta, Chiva and other massacred towns, the same thing will happen as in La Palma when the cameras return to Madrid: that the victims will have no one to defend them, that the granting of aid will continue in limbo. and that the people will have to save the people. Come on, same old story. This is why journalists have a moral obligation, beyond the audiences, to continue at the foot of the canyon.
The evil of many is good for a few: bastards like Aldamas and Co., quadruple accused like Begoña Gómez and sexual predators like Íñigo Errejón saw how their outrages were transformed, even for a few weeks, into gas. How they went from front page to headline news. The most beneficiary of the tragedy is Íñigo Errejón, whose terrible adventures were revealed on the afternoon of October 24 after a cynical resignation in which he accused his character of the alleged attacks he had perpetrated. Diabolical explanations which did not allow him to escape five days of headlines in newspapers, radio and television. What happens when such an important figure in national politics is accused of multiple sexual assaults? On the night of the 29th, we stopped talking about the one who had all the ballots to become the news of the year.
In the “Errejón case”, the time has come to point the finger at Yolanda Díaz, Mónica García and Rita Maestre, who knew the facts.
Now that 20 days have passed since the Valencian Armageddon, it is time to put in black and white something more than the episodes of Íñigo Errejón who is applied the same medicine that he prescribed to other men important people involved in similar events: the presumption of zero innocence. The time has come to point the finger at the leaders of Sumar, Más País and Más Madrid, that is, Yolanda Díaz, Mónica García and Rita Maestre. So let’s start by recalling what they themselves expressed in a less serious criminal incident, that perpetrated by Luis Rubiales. And I focus on the former president of the Royal Spanish Football Federation for the elementary fact that it is a little later in time than the groping of a woman’s ass carried out by the alter ego of the macho and no less delinquent Pablo for so many years. Churches:
“Rubiales must resign for assaulting a woman,” declared the vice president of the government a few hours after the infamous “piquito” of August 20, 2023. And sorry to use the term “piquito” which diminishes the seriousness of the events including he was a witness. half the world and part of the other in real time. But it is the concept that remained to summarize the kiss on the lips that the president of the Royal Federation at the time gave without consent to the 10 of the Spanish national team, Jenni Hermoso.
“This is violence against women,” declared almost at the same time the current Minister of Health, Mónica García, then spokesperson for Más Madrid.
“It’s an abuse of power and machismo,” said Rita Maestre, face and eyes of Más Madrid at Madrid City Hall and former partner of Íñigo Errejón. Yes, the same one that serves as José Luis Martínez-Almeida’s moral conscience.
I will not be the one to refute the reason of any of the three, but already at this procedural moment in history the three knew that Íñigo Errejón had been accused of touching a young woman during a concert at the Tremenda Fem Fest organized in Castellón in June. 17. They knew this because they had been in the public domain in Sumar, Más País and Más Madrid since June 19. And because it had been published on this Twitter that all three of them are addicted to. And all the more so since his comrade Loreto Arenillas had warned him through the regulatory channels.
Díaz, García and Maestre logically asked for hell for Rubiales but they protected Errejón with a thick veil over the events in Castellón
Which shows that if the criminal conduct of Íñigo Errejón is morally repugnant, the same or worse is that of these three subjects who call themselves “feminists”, “progressives” and I don’t know how many other -ists, in addition to claim exclusive defense. .women’s rights. They filled their mouths with the word “Rubiales” with all the reasons in the world but they didn’t say a word about Errejón’s aggression, in fact they threw tons of dirt on it, among other things because four weeks later there were general election events. “The important thing here is to continue in the official car!”, they must have thought. And the victims eat it themselves.
Well, what is certainly scandalous in terms of public morality is omerta that Díaz, García and Maestre were already practicing on August 20 of last year. They logically demanded hell for Rubiales while they protected Íñigo Errejón by spreading a thick veil over what happened in Castellón two months and three days before. Loreto Arenillas, victim of a purge that Stalin himself would envy, informed the head of feminism and the head of the Más Madrid Organization of what had happened in Castellón.
Several facts demonstrate that we are facing a major cover-up on the part of the Vice-President of the Government, the Minister of Health and the leader of the opposition at Madrid City Hall:
—The first is that no one paid attention to Loreto Arenillas, they barely treated her as someone deranged. And that’s not all: they disclosed that he spoke with the victim to convince her that “nothing happened.” Then they fired her even though she had fulfilled her legal obligation to organically elevate the episode.
—The second is that Errejón appeared a month later in fourth place in Sumar’s list for Madrid, in number 1 of which appeared a curious name: Yolanda Díaz.
— Seven months after the attack in Castellón, Yolanda Díaz appointed the alleged attacker as Sumar’s parliamentary spokesperson. With a pair.
It is unacceptable that Díaz, García and Maestre continue in office after choosing to cover up the atrocities of “Iñiguín”
The horror story experienced by actress Elisa Mouliaá should not have seemed Chinese to you when it appeared. We now discover that it was also an open secret, both in Sumar and Podemos. Which did not prevent him from occupying a permanent place in the election led by Yolanda Díaz, from being named spokesperson and from giving lessons in morality, law, ethics and aesthetics in newspaper, radio and television interviews while journalists and the public praised “moderation.” from a guy who said everything and on Rubiales’ orders two months after allegedly abusing a woman.
The courts will decide whether the facts attributed to a more than alleged sexual predator called Íñigo Errejón – who has already accumulated four complaints – are crimes, to an Íñigo Errejón who already showed violent ways when about three years ago he was denounced for having kicked the stomach of a retiree suffering from colon cancer, of an Íñigo Errejón who did not hesitate to denounce inquisitorially the media for their “silence” and to ” hide” the seriousness of what happened during the Women’s World Cup final in Australia.
Let the bird imitate The pack Calling Mouliaá’s complaint “false” may even seem humanly understandable, because he wants to get rid of his status as Víctor de Aldama’s cellmate in Soto del Real. And because he is god-level amoral. What is not acceptable is that Díaz, García and Maestre continue in office after choosing to cover up the atrocities of “Iñiguín” – that’s what some of them called him – instead of pulling the rug out from under them. How did individuals who protected an alleged sexual attacker and who, let us remember because this is not trivial, vote for a The law of yes only is yes who freed 1,300 rapists and pedophiles? The current situation, which logically concerns Valencia, will not prevent free journalism from doing its homework with shameless people who have gone from “sister, I believe you” to “sister, I have your back”.
