It will be fascinating for historians of the future to analyze the mental mechanisms of the present. president from Spain. I bring nothing new to the circus of opinion makers claiming that their bad inclination It is far superior to his sensitivity to good, like that of the vast majority of characters who populate history books. A good, honest, and mediocre person has many opportunities to lead a dignified, stable, and admirable life; but he will never perform any action of such importance that it would be recorded in a manual.
On the other hand, an evil, unbalanced and brilliant being greatly increases the chances of achieving an anomaly that, although disastrous for humanity, occupies generous pages in any self-respecting manual. The story of Pedro Sanchez It is that of someone who has survived his (multiple and glaring) flaws by relentlessly using cunning, cynicism and evil. The type of politics he pursues can be based on steel or poison, as long as he achieves his ends, which, as we all know, are nothing other than his own convenience.
Of all its strengths, in my opinion, the most remarkable is the flagrant absence of that quality typical of the human condition, from which fundamental rights emanate, and which is called dignity. For him, everything can be violatedwhatever its utility, essence and meaning. It is not for nothing that the maxim of Sanchez’s morality rests on a fundamental contradiction with the Platonic principle that doing evil is worse than enduring it. I assume that Sanchez knows this principle, although I am clearly convinced that he does not.
Very early on, he understood the importance of always saying what suited the majority at the bottom, putting in the foreground the criticism of the social class that, as we all know, is the minority. He plays with us without breaking a sweat and, the worst thing is that he has no rival at his height. Sánchez’s strange bedfellows are very well chosen, each maneuver perfectly thought out and planned. The histrionics, the imitatebarbiehe semi-healing ambitious, anything but cheerful, the smart guy in the hallway… Anyway, I’m not going to continue, because in the end, his cohort knows how to play their role, to support everything and at all costs, whatever happens.
In front is the bench of sailors in bluein which really (really, really, without easy diplomacy) no one stands out for their brilliance. They limit themselves to refuting in a childish way, trying to be witty and funny, with the typical agile verb that is asked of any politician, but without the slightest chance of overthrowing the deceitful devil. Our president is a brilliant master of evil, a guy of extraordinary cunning, with such a radical lack of scruples that he needs someone in front of him who instead stands out abnormally. Peperos of the planet, you need help, you better recognize it, if you do not want another equally sterile, monotonous and regrettable journey.
