Nearly a year has passed since this designation, in November 2023. During this journey, Alegría has emerged unscathed on several occasions while retaining ownership of the Education portfolio, another powder keg. However, this Tuesday, during the press conference held after the Council of Ministers, Pilar Alegría could not save the furniture.
To a question from EL ESPAÑOL about the latest car of the Madrid Provincial Court on the case of Begoña Gomez», the minister’s spokesperson responded with lies to predict his record. Furthermore, this was done just three weeks after the government approved the plan against disinformation and hoaxes.
Lies of joy
“First of all, what we learned yesterday is that The Court substantially estimates the resources presented. This in the first place,” Alegría emphasized.
“Second, the Court further indicates that there is a prospective, generic and imprecise survey. And that makes him ugly. It’s ugly that it’s happening like this,” he once wrongly said.
The Provincial Court did not declare the investigation to be “prospective.” In fact, part of the appeal presented by Gómez and the Prosecutor’s Office is based on this, but the car is pointing in the opposite direction: “Foresight is the investigation which begins in an indeterminate manner in search of possible criminal behavior without a minimum of specificity and well-founded suspicion, but which is not based on rationally suspect behavior (exercise of influence or promise of exercise to condition the decision). -making) in exchange for undue advantages), opens a vast investigation which allows us to know in detail all the circumstances which can influence and determine their qualification.
He doesn’t call the car either “generic and imprecise” the research carried out. He only does it with the words “I have the resolution under appeal”.
Alegría continued his response by saying: “In addition, you have been able to read and see how, for the second time, Judge Peinado limits the scope of action in this case to a minimum. It’s a wise amendment, if I may.. “That limits the field of action as much as possible, as I say.” The error prevents us from knowing exactly what he meant, although it is understood that it is a matter of reducing the scope of action to a minimum.
What the car actually does is refer to another precedent to remind itself that it is excluded from the investigation.the facts relating to Globalia as long as truly new facts with incriminating content do not appear and are evaluated in a reasoned judicial decision.
What Alegría said does not stop there: “On the other hand, what also seems fundamental to me, the public validates the reports from the UCO, the Civil Guard and also the Prosecutor’s Officewhich are the reports which also made it clear from the first moment that there was no irregularity.
The order issued makes it clear that the fact that the reports did not reveal irregularities is not “fundamental”. Furthermore, on the basis of the UCO report, the order specifies: “Without forgetting that the perfect award of offers would not prevent the prior award of contracts crime of influence peddling. In these awards, we appreciated objective data in which the personal intervention of the accused in support of the Barrabés companies was confirmed and which justified the investigation.”
Furthermore, the order specifies: “The applicants also mention the two UCO reports and the testimonies which were carried out, affirming that they do not bring anything new, in relation to our decree of May 29repeated so many times, when the simple verification of the data contained in the report leaves behind the applicants’ allegations that they contribute nothing to the subject of the investigation. “Furthermore, “this is not the appropriate procedural moment for its assessment. “
“For everything, what I can tell you, with the conclusion or the evaluation that you asked me, is that with this resolution, what seems clear is that the submission of this file is approaching” , concluded Alegría, who once again insisted on his last sentence: “Logically, with what we learned yesterday from the Court, It seems clear that we are clearly getting closer to the file of this case“.
This could be interpreted this way due to the difficulty that the Court considers to prove the offense of influence peddling, but in reality what it indicates is that the investigation will take a long time: “This instruction is in its early stagestaking into account the complexity of the facts investigated and the difficulty encountered in the investigation of the operations whose discovery is sought.”
Political life
Pilar Alegria (November 1, 1977) was born in a rural family in Zaidaa small town of Aragon. His father combined working the land with work in a coal factory in a nearby town; Her mother was a housewife, but she also sometimes cleaned the school and sold wine and sweets wholesale to the family home.
He has been a socialist since he was young. At the age of 24, he was already head of the cabinet of Eva Almunia, Minister of Education of the Aragonese Government of the time, which would ultimately lead him to Madrid with the help of Almunia herself, appointed Secretary of State.
She made her debut as a congresswoman in 2008, which allowed her to meet Pedro Sánchez in Madrid. In 2015 he will return to Aragon to be Innovation Advisor to the Lambán Government.
His next action at the internal party level was to defend Susana Diaz in the struggle with Pedro Sánchez to lead the socialists. She would be the spokesperson for Andalusian before returning to Zaragoza fighting for mayor in the 2019 elections. He won, but did not govern due to an agreement between the two countries. PP, Vox and Ciudadanos.
Pilar Alegría then started riding with Susana Díaz. He became the spokesperson for the Andalusian, who ended up dying in his fight with Pedro Sánchez. In 2019, she was a socialist candidate for mayor of Zaragoza. He won, but did not govern due to an agreement between PP, Vox and Ciudadanos.
Pedro Sánchez, despite everything, would not blame him. He first offered her a secretary of state which he rejected, was Government Delegate and in 2021 he will take charge of the Education portfolio, with some obstacles to resolve such as the implementation of the famous Celaá law. After accepting the position of spokesperson for the PSOE, in November 2023, she was also appointed government spokesperson.
