In the show In everyone’s mouth, Four, A Julie Salandre (google, “political scientist, data analyst and digital feminist activist”), whose last name is surely inspired by Lisbeth Salander, fictional character created by the Swedish novelist Stieg Larsson, He declared on the phone and without the slightest delicacy that “all men are potential rapists. Let’s see. Potentially everything. we can be anything, especially those to which our genes and hormones preferentially predispose us. But many feminists are discovering the most dangerous The Mississippians, some that allow them to see the speck in another’s eye but never the beam alone. Indeed, the ability to rape is more natural in men. For obvious reasons related to the adequacy of your sexual apparatus and other less obvious ones that require more subtlety and trainingespecially in the natural sciences. It is not surprising that the Tertullian Antonio Naranjo, interested in rigorous testing (I also know this because he read my last book) Against feminism to emphasize the same thing that I would have emphasized ipso facto: Following Lisbeth’s reasoning (or lack thereof), women would be all potential prostitutes Well, we also come into the world with very specific conditions. Therefore, at any time and in any place, the majority of prostitution is female. And yet, we tend to like it just as little when people tell us “potential prostitutes” than to men “potential rapists.”
But of course, militant and aggressive feminism constitutes an appetizing niche of social, political and economic opportunities. And the Salandre of the septum (we are talking about aesthetics rather than ethics) they don’t suck their thumbs. This is probably why, like Mae West’s bad girls, they are invited everywhere, from radio to television, including the press. Because, moreover, her shameless piety This usually silences professionals in the sector (women and men) who have few resources to deal with it. We already know that human meat is cheap and chivalry (or simple prudence, as is the case in the court) seems to continue to be a paralyzing virtue. So I am glad that Antonio Naranjo, a man who seems very tired does not want to let him pass. This aggressive and suicidal anti-male feminism has already done enough damage. As if these activists had not had father, husband or male children! As this lady with precarious letters says (unfortunately, that’s psychology in Spain) totally sheltered from the influence of scientific analysis and respect for objective data. I am referring to the former minister, now a Member of the European Parliament, Irene Montero, who, in the heat of this controversy, was quick to point out that “sexist violence is structural and not an isolated case.”
Poor children. I don’t want to know what kind of dystopian conversations they’ll have at home. “Structural” could be in the sense I talked about a few paragraphs above. But that would be the way it would be. “construction” such as certain provisions according to which females of various species must offer sexual relations in exchange for favors. And we are not entering into anyone’s private life, for the record. But the former minister does not stop there. He stated in Please tell us where such a rule exists, in what code, in what regulation, other than in Afghanistan. What exists here, in any case, is a set of so-called “gender” laws that discriminate against half the population and destroy the presumption of innocence of those who are carriers of XY genes and they didn’t declare themselves trans.
The “political scientist” called all men “potential rapists,” including the journalists at the table. But she angrily cut off the call, complaining that someone was calling her “stupid.” But I think it was the unexpected mention of the “world’s oldest profession,” garlic stringing, that scared her off. And unfortunately, in the UAB political science major, they see little or no science.
