Protection of the former secretary of the PSOE organization, Santos SerdanHe introduced the first resource against his entry into prison. His lawyers transferred him directly to the appeal room of the Supreme Court, arranging instructor Leopoldo Puente.
In its brief presentation, to which Lasexta had access, the protection of former socialist states, which “There are no signs of a sufficient crime against Santos Serdan” And he believes that the prison car in “incompatible with the presumption of innocence.” In addition, they accuse the investigating judge of Suppose “inquisitive perspective”The field “The prospect alleged by the jurisdictional body is purely inquisitive,” the spelling describes in detail, emphasizing that all the explanations raised as a result of the investigation in his statement, before the instructor was simply rejected, and “responds to the appearance that does not accept another thesis, except guilty”.
The history of the protection of the serdan is very complicated against learning and research, speaking of the “general reason” in which a preliminary prison was published “Without another purpose, than getting recognition”The field and, thus, accuse the criminal investigation of that it is in a place very close to the “torture investigation”. Serdan’s lawyers delved into various points of the letter in history that this is a “political case”The field “Historical lawyer Miguel Castells said, who received a condemnation in the ECHR in the Kingdom of Spain for violating his freedom of expression – that there are judgments in which prosecutors talk about politics, the police talk about politics, the press speaks of politics, and the only ones who are not allowed to talk about politics are already their defenders,” the appeal says. “It seems to us a successful thought,” they add.
ABOUT Assumptions of public workHe insists that he used as “the interlocutor between the party and the government”, therefore, his “interest in several works for months and weeks before the election campaign, for the need to reveal some paralyzed work.”
In line, he assures that the magistrate misunderstood the explanation that Serdan gave to the judicial headquarters, when in his resolution it indicates that “public works did not persecute the interest of citizenship, but” elections of election benefits that a tender or execution could represent for his party. ” “Serdan explained how proud he felt that he managed to resume the works of N-121a, the road in Navarra, in which three or four people died every year, and that no one died since the work,” the defense replies.
In his opinion, this assessment of world evidence, which “The instructor’s assessment is always against REO”, Accusing him, in addition to the assumption of the report of the central operational unit (UCO) of the civil guard against the attic in the “joint -stock” method.
Last Monday, Soto -Tod -Real (Madrid) entered last Monday, considering a judge who would undergo crimes regarding integration into a criminal organization, bribery and impact, and that there is a founded danger, “that former No. 3 PSOE can“ hide, change or destroy ”evidence.
