“In difficult times, do not move,” is a well-known piece of advice from St. Ignatius of Loyola, who Sanchez interprets at your convenienceand given the difficult times ahead, has chosen to bring forward to November the Federal Congress planned for 2025 and thus avoid a possible change of Ferraz and Moncloa. Undoubtedly, he considers that he currently controls the party, which is not guaranteed by then given the tension generated in him by the economic concert, – “unique” financing as defined by the Vice President and Minister of Finance.
The decision was adopted immediately after the decision of the socialist executive Aragon, chaired (still) by Lamban, to reject this agreement with ERC to make Illa president, which confirms this presumption. If this decision extends to Castilla-La Mancha and Asturias, without excluding Madrid and others, which is likely given the public positions adopted by the regional presidents and general secretaries of the respective regions socialist federations-In a year the situation would not be so pleasant for his re-election. Especially if to this reality is added the parliamentary panorama where the situation of his allies Together And MRC with Puigdemont unleashed and ERC in an uncertain pre-congress process, ensuring that the approval of budgets.
It should be borne in mind that currently the 2023 deadlines have already been extended and that a new extension would virtually mean having not a government but “a doubly useless object”, according to Sánchez’s expression, alluding to the fact that a government without a budget was like a “car without gasoline”, which he described as such. Of course, this expression was addressed to PP government before reaching an agreement with the PNV, and with those he subsequently governed, when his motion of censure was carried out precisely thanks to those same votes, in an example of nationalist “loyalty”.
With this argument, any other president thinking of the the general interest of Spain, He would dissolve the Cortes and call elections, but then he would not be Pedro Sánchez. This is one of the toxic consequences for politics and social coexistence of having at the head of government a person for whom truth and lies simply do not exist. Now converted into mere “changes of opinion”, changes that “coincidentally” always coincide with what is best for “their person” at any given moment.
A very clear example of what this means the sanchista drift submitting Spain to the interests of the Catalan and Basque separatist parties, this can be seen by comparing the current situation with the last edition of Federal Congress held in 2021 in Valencia. On this occasion, two former leaders of the PSOE and the presidents of the government, Felipe Gonzalez And Rodriguez Zapatero, They solemnly expressed their support for Sánchez. The former has now repeatedly expressed his absolute divergence with the Sanchista policy, while the second became his Maduro’s privileged interlocutor, of which he is also the international guarantor, which is not exactly the best calling card at the moment.
8 years ago, on October 1, 2016 – a curious date… – the PSOE dismissed him from his position as secretary general in a Federal Historical Committee, precisely to prevent him from doing what he has been doing since he took power again in Ferraz. Today, the current PSOE is nothing more than a mere political instrument at the service of Sánchez’s interests, subject to his continuous “changes of opinion”. In the history of PSOE This stage deserves to be placed on a par with that which marked episodes as dramatic and disastrous for Spain as the coup d’état of October 1934 against the legitimate government of the Republic. Without forgetting the pout February 1936 election by which the Popular front He acceded to the government that would lead to civil war. The Constitution of Concord of 1978 turned the page on these episodes in the interest of an authentic national reconciliation, but there is no reason to forget what these acronyms do as submissive allies of the enemies of Spain. Without any other principle than that of maintaining power. And this will not be forgotten in the collective memory: not the “historical and democratic” Sancho memory.
