This Wednesday, the Parliamentary Commission voted against the appearance of Gabriel Le Senne (Vox) in the hate crime case of the President of the Balearic Chamber himself, regarding the incidents with the photo of Aurora Picornell, with the vote against Le Senne.
As the “popular” spokesman, Sebastià Sagreras, pointed out at the press conference after the meeting of spokespeople, a presentation “of these characteristics” by Parliament is of no “use” to citizens. “It is a decision that corresponds to the Council,” he added.
On the other hand, the PSIB criticized the fact that Le Senne was able to vote whether or not Parliament has appeared in a matter that concerns it. “We are surprised that the PP does not appreciate that the president has to abstain from making decisions that concern it,” said the socialist spokesman, Iago Negueruela.
In the same spirit, the deputy of Unidas Podemos, Cristina Gómez, criticized the fact that Le Senne voted in this regard and considered that “there is very clearly a conflict of interest.” “I do not understand how the president does not see that he should not be present in the making of decisions that directly concern him,” he noted.
Sources from the presidential office of the Parliament clarified that Le Senne’s abstention or non-vote in this regard would not have been possible.or would have changed the outcomebecause it requires a majority.
