The prosecutor of the case is given that the judge “must immediately withdraw the case” for charges that will not formulate the charges of the investigation, the former conseller of Salome Pradas and the former regional emergency department Emilio Arguao. “We understand that the instructor must immediately separate from the reasons for popular accusations that do not formulate the accusations, since the accusations – as his name indicates – are not impartial observers of the procedure and should not accuse or be excluded,” says public ministry in a letter to which Eldario .es had access. The only popular accusation that categorically excluded that there are signs of a criminal crime in the actions of two investigated, according to this newspaper, was the one that lawyer Juan Chapapri (warlike PP, very close to the expression of Francisco camps). Other popular accusations, such as those that VOX carried out, not so clearly excluded the existence of signs against Pradas and Argüeso, although they considered “accelerated” to pronounce the instructions in this regard.
The representative of the state ministry resorted to the order of the magistrate -instructor who rejected the group of charges.
The letter of the Ministry of Financial Ministry “plans” the arguments of the investigating judge to exclude the grouping of accusations, both specific and popular, in the procedure. The justice of the peace in the resolution on July 4 rejected the request for the protection of former Consient Salomers, claiming that the association will “limit” the right to accusations, without guaranteeing as soon as possible in the practice of applications. ”
On the contrary, the prosecutor Fernando Maldonado guarantees that numerous accusations, both specific and popular, “caused a wonderful delay in processing the case”, with “numerous” reform resources and an appeal against the judge’s resolutions. “The time and efforts that the teacher does not value in determining possible delays in administering justice,” he says.
The accusations, according to a representative of the state ministry, asked for “persistently” accusations of “numerous” people who were previously refused (especially the Government delegate, Pilara Bernabe, President of the Hydrographic Confederation of Yocokar, Migmatology Ayet, Josea -Nueeea -).
“Certain” private and popular accusations, mourn the prosecutor, “resist” to accept the measurement of accusations against the former Conosseller Pradas and the former autonomous Minister of Emergency Situations Emilio Arguzu. The measurement, recalls Fernando Maldonado, who was approved by the second section of the Provincial Court of Valencia.
A brief presentation considers that the existence of unjustified proceedings “is a reality that the ward itself can observe after the resolution of numerous appeal resources processed and permitted.”
Criticism of folk accusations
The prosecutor does not see that there is a great ideological distance between the accusations (from VOX to PSPV-PSOE, compromise or subem) justifies that they are not united: “clearly opposite” positions of “political nature” can not and should not establish their procedural activity, ”he says.
“The criminal process is not a place for political parties and associations to represent their electoral programs or social goals, therefore, their unification is not impossible or procedural anomaly, as shows us daily in the practice of ships and courts,” the Manvetite MANFIEST Ministry of Fiscal.
The fact that there are 38 parts in the procedure will lead to the fact that a possible oral court will be “hardly controlled,” the prosecutor says.
“Remarkable” unjustified delay
Given the “noticeable” unjustified delay, “a scarce or not procedural deposit of accusations” and “forced balance between accusations and protection”, the prosecutor asks the popular to prescribe “unique protection and representation” or that, despite this, he is prescribed for the rush (the first that appeared due to).
For private accusations, a representative of the state ministry suggests that “voluntarily choose their representatives in procedural actions that should not exceed five, unless conflicting and irreconcilable interests.” “In case of disagreement, the prosecution may coordinate the first five charges against the part.”
Pradas offers two popular and three people
On the other hand, the protection of Salome -Pradas appealed to an appeal to the decision of the judge, which excluded the combination of charges. The resource to which this newspaper had access to, that both private and popular accusations be grouped by “procedural dexterity” and “efficiency and operation” of the reason that “from its size uses sessions and sessions that will predict for months.”
Thus, Pradas lawyers offer and “understand reasonable” that the accusations are combined in two popular and three people. If the defense is not achieved, the defense asks the teacher to appoint a group, “combining the criteria of an ideological set of people’s accusations, such as temporaryness, for specific accusations, the elections of the first three people.”
