During a conference on amnesty, he defends the “solid” interpretation of the Supreme Court and cannot imagine that the Constitutional Court will correct it
After seven years of judicial investigation into the “trial”, during which he only expressed himself through his resolutions, the magistrate of the Supreme Court Pablo Llarena broke out this Wednesday to speak about the law of amnesty and defend its interpretation.
Session limit reached
- Access to Premium content is open thanks to the establishment you are in, but there are currently too many users connected at the same time. Please try again after a few minutes.
try again
You have exceeded the session limit
- You can only start three sessions at a time. We have closed the oldest session so you can continue browsing the rest without limits.
Continue browsing
Article reserved for subscribers
Report a bug
