The fight began following a comment by Puente in which he analyzed what had happened with Alvise and the 100,000 euros “in b” that he had obtained from a financial bar, establishing that for him these bad arts are not newbut what really caught his attention was how, in his view, the SALF ideologue had ceased to be useful to the right.
“Alvise’s disgrace is not because he was exposed as a professional fraudster and defamer. This was already known. But while He has dedicated himself to defaming and harassing left-wing politicians and people.on the right it suited him perfectly. Now this bothers the right,” wrote the socialist.
This tweet was quoted by Alvise, announcing that he had put a new complaint to the head of Transport for defamation. A message which the MEP took advantage of to recall previous legal incursions in Puente.
“You have just been sued for defamation, Minister. If it is “harassment” to discover you with your lover in a €180,000 Mercedes belonging to a concession company, and you are heading towards the yacht of another businessman that you hired via the Town Hall …why didn’t you report him to me for “harassment” and I won all your complaints“Minister?” Alvise counterattacked, in a tweet that ended with another provocation: “Don’t worry: I will accept payment of your sentence in cash.”
Puente’s response took only half an hour, with a short message but one that followed the rough line that both have maintained: “You smell like prison.”the minister told him.
To know the “guerrilla war” between Alvise and the former mayor of Valladolid, we have to go back to 2020 when, still as councilor of the Castilian city, the founder of the SALF denounced him for allegedly flouting the containment measures. Since then, they have been various subsequent accusations and complaints filed by Puenteincluding the one derived from the photo of the Mercedes that Alvise remembers in his message. All were rejected by the Court, finding that public officials are “forced to bear a certain risk that their subjective personality rights are affected by critical opinions”.
