The advisor of Industry and of Ecological and digital transition of businesses of the Government of Navarra, Mikel Irujodeclared this Thursday that the public company Sodena “he did not participate in the nomination” of the ETA assassin Bixente Nazábal as a member of the Board of Directors of sunsundegui“.
In response to a question from Voice in plenary session of ParliamentIrujo emphasized that “in the case of Bixente Nazábaltheir election was made autonomously and in accordance with the regulations in force by representatives of active staff with actionswho have the right to choose their representation within the Board of Directors“.
The advisor explained that “one of the conditions for granting a second loan to sunsundeguiresponding to the company’s request for more financing, included the composition of a new Board of Directors“and that said the Council” would be composed of three people independenttwo other people named by Sodena and one for her address“.
Subsequently, this continued, in the General assembly from February 29 sunsundegui The appointment of this Board of Directors. “It was determined by a legal report that by holding the workers 39% of actionsthey even had two seats in the said Board of Directorswhich was not foreseen in the condition in which he put Sodena by granting these 6 million“, he explained.
“THE workers They gave up having two, they only took one and it was them and only them, the workers of sunsundeguiwithout any consensus with Sodenathose who decided to appoint the person of Bixente Nazábal“, he indicated, to emphasize that “Sodena did not participate in the nomination of Bixente Nazábal as a member of the Board of Directors of sunsundegui“.
For her part, the parliamentarian of Voice Maïté Nosti indicated that “Mr. Irujoas president of Sodena And industrial advisorAnd Iñaki Larrayageneral director of Sodenahave been fully informed of the proposed appointment of Bixente Nazábalhe ETA responsible for the murder of Jesus Ulayar“.” This meeting was consensual and approved”, he declared, criticizing that there was “obvious hidden information“.
According to him, “it is incomprehensible that this Governmentwhich aims to promote the brand Navarrecommit actions such as those performed with sunsundeguiwhich, far from projecting confidence, have favored the lack of reliability And transparency which characterizes its management“.
