The Italian court says that a non -biological mother has the right to paternity in the trade union

& Nbspgavin Blackburn

Was published

Advertising

The Constitutional Court of Italy ruled that the Biological Mother in the Union (for example, marriage) of the same gender has the right to permission to paternity, equating its role to the role of the father and, therefore, has the right to touch with the newborn.

On Monday, the court ruled that the Decree of 2001 on parental leave was unconstitutional, since he did not admit that the Biological mother in the Lesbian Political Union also had the right to a mandatory license for Italian paternity at 10 days.

The court claimed that the child’s interest is to have time with parents, and the responsibilities of parents do not depend on their sexual orientation.

This is the second decision for several months, which was welcomed by the activists of the LGBTQ+ community, among the efforts of the Right Government of the Prime Minister Georgia Melona, to direct surrogate motherhood and contribute to traditional family values.

In May, the Constitutional Court ruled that two women can register as a child’s parents in a birth certificate, saying that recognition of parental rights can not only be limited to a biological mother when addressing families with homosexual parents.

Italy has strict restrictions on IVF and has banned surrogate motherhood since 2004.

Last year, under the Government of Melonia, the country expanded the ban on the criminalization of Italians who go abroad to have children through surrogate motherhood.

The last decision is intended for women who went abroad for the legitimate treatment of IVF.

As in the case of a May decision, the trade union of professional life and family criticized the court decision as “funny”, saying that this is another proof of how “gender madness” affects the social and legal occupation of Italy.

The legislator Alessandro Gene, who for a long time insisted on higher rights Loatki+ in Italy, welcomed the decision as the historical ending of the “unfair and sharp distinction.”

“Justice reminds the government a simple principle: love is a family, and every boy and girl have the right to care and protect both parents without discrimination,” he said on social networks.

More sources • AP.

Leave a Comment