Valencia Court of Instructions No. 15 He refused to open an oral court and agreed with the preliminary archive of the open case against the former vice president Conslla Monica OltraWhose resignation was completed for three years on June 21, and several of his former employees for the alleged concealment of sexual violence committed by his former man.
In the car from this Friday, The magistrate “completely coincides with the criteria”, exhibited by the Ministry of the Fiscal population, which does not see the established facts of a criminal offense As a result of the execution of the former fins and expression of the previous Botanik government and out of 14 other people.
The judge believes that the facts “They are not components of a criminal offense“.” But, in addition, there are absolutely no signs that one of the accused made criminal facts, ”he says.
In support of this statement, he refers to how much he already said in the order, according to which he agreed with the preliminary dismissal of the case, which was subsequently canceled by another from the provincial court of Valencia, which insists that the qualifications of the prosecutor “corresponds to the facts that gathered in the order, by order, according to which the reason was remembered in his intermediate stage.”
“In short, the accusations, specific and popular, are based on simple assumptions or suspicions that are not subject to evidence of the charges in any positionI evaluate the field that no one should judge without a single rational indication against crime against him, and, according to conscience, I repeat that I do not appreciate them in the behavior of the accused, ”he says.
This should lead to the fact that “it is necessary and again,” he notes, to preliminary dismissal of the case in relation to all the accused, “some of which were not even accused.”
On the Other Hand, The Head of Instruction 15 States that, “Respecting the Right of Action, AS A Manifestation of the Right to Effective Judicial Protection,” The Fact will not be assessed, which however must be reviewed by the consequences that could be derived from this, that the accusing parties “introduce certain facts that do not Conform to the Facts Collected in the Order by Which The Prosecution of the Cise in their Phase in Their Phase Intermediate, Which Litellly Those Those Those Those Those Those Those Those Which were identified in the order of temporary dismissal, and which were not changed by any resolution.
