The General Council of the judiciary (CGPJ) did not collect data on the monitoring of the first strike convened by five associations of judges and prosecutors, which prevents the provision of the Ministry of Justice from the discharge of wages to those who supported unemployment. Given the absence of official data, soccer organizations increase the participation of 75% of judges and prosecutors who were active on Tuesday, although the day usually passed in a large part of the country’s courts and prosecutors, as it could check Eldiario.es. The government demonstrated its “respect” to the strike and confirmed its defense of the “modernizing reform” promoted by the Minister of Justice by Felix Bolanos.
The Ministry of Justice asked CGPJ and the General Prosecutor of the state, which until 14:00 on Tuesday will inform him of the judges and prosecutors who supported the strike convened by all associations except progressive. The goal was to “find out the call monitoring and divert the salary of those who support it.” According to justice, this communication is “necessary to ensure good use of state funds”, since the ministry is a paid body, ”say government sources.
The permanent commission of CGPJ met on Monday and agreed to support the criteria adopted at the plenary session last Thursday, which determines that the judge lacks legal “support” in this right and did not give a call “declared”. Consequently, CGPJ does not collect participation data and is limited to the requirement of regional courts that take into account the incidents that they consider appropriate. Without these data, the Ministry of Justice will not be able to discount salaries of attackers. At the press conferences, representatives of the sowing associations defended that this money should be distracted. “This is what we have been demanding since 2009,” said Maria Hesus -Tod -Barko, a representative of the professional master’s program (APM).
Thus, CGPJ departs from the criteria consistent in the last strike of judges and prosecutors, which took place in 2018, when it was Minister Dolores Delgado. The body tells the Ministry of Data those who participated in the strike extracted from those that they sent to the governing bodies. Then the judge, first with a discount from the salary accounts for those who supported the protest, but the National Court failed that the ministry was not “competent” to do this and was forced to return these amounts. The Department, director of Félix Bolaños, now intended to discount this wage on the grounds that it is important to “ensure good use of state funds.”
Refusal of CGPJ data collection also causes the only existing monitoring data that are the data of sparrowing associations that confirmed that 75% of judges and prosecutors who work on Tuesday (elimination of deputy judges, victims, diseases, licenses or special services) supported unemployment. APM President, Maria Hesus -Tod -Banko, explained that the proposed data are based on the number of “emails”, which they received in the email account included as a result of strikes from judges and prosecutors who decided to report this. It was personal and voluntary communication.
Normality in court
Despite the high figure provided by the organizers, the courts and courts encountered this first blow with obvious normality. In the Supreme Court and in the National Court, proceedings, statements and decisions submitted on the agenda. The three trials planned for this Tuesday in a special court were carried out without any cases.
In the courts, Plaza -ure Castigillo -e -Madrid, uncertainty celebrated this first day. Neither lawyers nor officials received official reports on the functioning of various courts: “We will be like this day, with statements every 20 minutes, not knowing whether they can be held, two employees sitting in the lobby of the second floor commentary,“ alone noted me through WhatsApp, ”they comment on. From there, they explain, they collect information and transmit it to those who pass through the region.
Despite the strike, many courts usually supported their activities, and minimal services, such as detained, prisoners, minors or courts, are guaranteed. According to the monitoring, which is carried out from the Office of the Association of Lawyers, they have only eight out of 54 judges who were added to the strike today, although some lawyers suspect that there will be magistrates who do this under the guise.
It is interesting that the mobilization of judges and prosecutors was not what changed the usual image of the Plaza Castilla building. For all plants, posters hang, which announce that Cacerolada gathered at 11 a.m. CCOO in protest against state justice of justice, which affects all judicial officials. “We are workers of workers,” shouted more than a dozen participants. “We are 45,000 workers who are those who make it possible, of course, with judges, lawyers and prosecutors that this is a justice management that works, and yet we are not,” CCOO condemns the CCOO in the courts of Plaza Castilla.
Meanwhile, only one poster is in all property – in the door of the ward of the trial of the court on training No. 37 – warns: “This judge strikes because she wants professional, independent and impartial justice for the service of citizenship.” After 9:30 in the morning, the lawyer and his client just knew that his statement was suspended. The lawyer speaks yesterday, moving to what could happen today, asked if the statement could be fulfilled. No one could confirm this, so his client, eighty years, with reduced mobility, had to move to court this morning so that, finally, his statement was postponed in October.
This is not the only lawyer who tried to advance to what could happen in the next few days. Nevertheless, the only recommendation they receive from officials is to represent themselves in the courts usually and wait there to be notified. From the delegation of UGT, they regret that “everything that is suspended today will remain behind the tables of officials for new accusations of very close summons, which further interfere with the State Service of Justice.”
Resignation among lawyers
In the city of Barcelona, one of the few visible signs of the strike was the poster, which the court 25 led at the door of the prominent room. He announced that the trials with mild crimes were suspended.
Lawyers, who were not previously notified by the court, took it with resignation, since the suspension of the trial is not much more rarely in their daily life. “The fact that they suspend the trial or the application usually occurs almost every week, with or without a strike,” said the lawyer in the halls of the Barcelona court building.
He resigned less, there was another lawyer who preferred to maintain anonymity when he saw how a video conference with a training court in Madrid was suspended in a strike. “I understand and protect the right to strike, but it will not cost anything to notify professionals earlier. The effect of the strike would be the same, but now I have to explain to the client that the application is transmitted in October, because yesterday the court did not want to say anything to me, ”the lawyer ate.
In most other Barcelona vessels, the atmosphere was normal: lawyers and witnesses hoped to enter statements in the halls, and lawyers photocopied the reasons, as on a normal day. In the absence of official data, the frequency of the strike differed greatly depending on the court: according to legal sources, three social courts have suspended opinions.
