Home Entertainment News “The level of sludge in the Court of Seville is only comparable...

“The level of sludge in the Court of Seville is only comparable to that of DANA”

15
0
“The level of sludge in the Court of Seville is only comparable to that of DANA”

Antonio del Castillo, father of Marta del Castillo, severely criticized the latest decision of the Seville court, which, after acquitting Francisco Javier García The cuckoo and his mother, Rosalía García, for the crime of perjury in the trial against the adults, issued an order refusing to clarify the acquittal decision handed down last June. The court does not appreciate “any obscure concept” in this decision nor does it consider it “relevant” to replace the paragraph that says that El Cuco accepted as good the facts included in the prosecutor’s indictment.

“The level of mud in the Audiencia (of Seville) is only comparable to that left by the passage of a DANA. How is it possible that even if they plead guilty, they are acquitted? And with the arrogance they display, these gods of Olympus in black robes. Cronyism is like that,” wrote Antonio del Castillo on his social networks.

Criminal Court No. 7, it will be recalled, sentenced El Cuco and his mother to two years in prison for lying when they appeared as witnesses in the trial against adults held in 2011. The sentence was later overturned by the court of Seville, which also revoked the compensation of Marta’s parents of 30,000 euros under civil liability. “The enemies are no longer Carcaño or El Cuco, they are the judges,” Marta del Castillo’s father said after hearing the sentence.

El Cuco denied having been at this address during León hours. His mother said she saw him shortly after, between 1:30 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. El Cuco’s friends denied being with him during these times.

The Court underlines in its order that it is not appropriate to “complete the proven facts by adding facts recognized by the accused”, because “these are undisputed facts” and such a mention is not not considered “relevant”.

The Court also refuses to debate the replacement of a paragraph which cites that the accused “recognized the facts that were read to him, those of the prosecution, and not those of the private and popular accusations”, understanding that it is of “nuances of writing that are not appropriate to achieve, because there is no “obscure” or “relevant” concept.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here