Former President of the Government Felipe González has once again denounced Pedro Sánchez and his government. On this occasion, he criticized his system of distribution of wealth and questioned his “successes”.
Felipe Gonzalez questioned on Tuesday that the executive of Pedro Sánchez is “the most progressive in history” because, according to him, it is “an offense to reason” and it is “the most unequal in terms of redistribution” of income with “macroeconomic success”.
“It’s one thing to govern and another to be in government. At least it aims to ensure that others do not govern,” the former socialist leader said in an interview with Night in 24 hours (FTE), in which he criticized the leadership of the PSOE for “the policy” with which Pedro Sánchez presented himself in the legislative elections. In turn, he returned criticize the amnesty law agreed with Junts for the inauguration of the current head of the Executive. “My opinion is based on the party’s resolutions and not on what happens next,” he said.
González, who confirmed that he did not receive the invitation to the 41st Federal Congress of the PSOE in Seville, stressed that the primary system “did not work” in Spain. “The party of activists? Maybe it is, but I can’t identify it,” he asked.
Asked about the investigation into Begoña Gómez, the day after the Madrid court refused to close her case, the former president of the government regretted that politics was being judicialized, while asking for respect for the rule of law. “If judges make mistakes, there are resources, but they cannot interfere in the functioning of the judiciary,” explained González, who criticized the polarization of society that comes “from above” – with reference to politics – and with the commissions of inquiry, which are for “exposure”, reports Ep
Regarding the legal reform that could benefit more than 40 ETA prisoners, approved unanimously in Congress, González highlighted that the European directive was challenged by Rajoy’s government to exclude terrorism, which was approved by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). as he remembers it.
“ETA terrorism has disappeared, but have terrorist crimes disappeared? The execution of sentences? “It is a reasonable doubt,” said the former president, who recognized that the debate was still open and interpretable, although he regretted that the deputies of Congress “must have more important questions that no one is conscious.”
