The PP registered its vote on Thursday appeal for unconstitutionality against the amnesty lawwhose presentation was returned to the magistrate Jose Maria Macias, one of the major detractors of the standardwhich he has called unconstitutional whenever asked about it.
According to him, “it is a law which has no legitimate constitutional basis“and with this” we are going beyond the Constitution.” He also stated that “it is unconstitutional” and that “it does not fit into the constitutional framework because it has nothing to do with the general interest.” “Everyone knows that. he. , No one can doubt that this law is unconstitutional.“, he even condemned.
With this positioning behind him, is his challenge as a speaker on this issue? According to sources close to the magistrate, who will officially take office this Friday, nothing has yet been discussed on this subject.
On the progressive side, however, it is recalled that another magistrate in a similar situation, the former Minister of Justice Juan Carlos Campohas already communicated its decision voluntarily withdraw from the deliberations.
With Campo’s decision and pending what Macías might take, the balance of power within the Constitutional Court would currently be six to five in favor of the progressiveseven though the PP wants to reverse the situation and has already raised the challenge of the President of the Court, Cándido Conde-Pumpido, and that of Professor Laura Díez.
