The prosecutor in the trial for the fatal beating of Samuel Luiz compared with a “pack of wolves” to the five accused, four men and one woman, of his death. He described what happened as a “group attack” and “inhumane” with the “active participation” of “everyone”.
During the trial, he recalled that the pack of wolves went hunting with prey as a common goal. “If this prey is part of a herd, they first select it and isolate it,” he said, then emphasizing that while some attack, others “avoid defense.”
“Make no mistake, I don’t call them wolves. Wolves hunt to survive, Human beings hunt and kill for pleasure, for wallowing in the pain of others,” he added.
In this way, the accused who some witnesses located hitting or grabbing the victim by the neck, defined them respectively as “an alpha male” one and “lieutenant of the chief” another.
“An attack which lasted three minutes and extended over 150 meters”, he summarized to emphasize that there was “intention to kill“They were aware that with the action they were taking there was a high probability that he would die,” he said in presenting his final report to the court. In this one, he insisted on the blows to the head. suffered the deceased and the bleeding he suffered due to the attack.
“Everyone,” he summed up, estimating that the five participated in a “surprise attack” and “no defense option”. This excludes the possibility that the events could also be described as a “fight”. “We are talking about at least seven people to one,” he said to rule out any possibility of defense. “It was a group of all against one,” he added, referring to what witnesses said as well as forensic experts who ruled out “signs of a struggle”.
He describes what happened as a “hunt”
Furthermore, as he did at the beginning of the trial, he considered what happened a “hunt.” “Humans kill and hunt for pleasure, hunting by group attack.” This in an exhibition in which he defined Diego MM as the “alpha male” who displays “his raw strength and of which he is proud” with participation in the entire attack.
“Active participation”stated against the defense argument that he only hit him initially, outside, and that other people were later involved. The “displayed violence” has been linked to the victim’s sexual orientation and his references to phrases such as “he was a fucking faggot”.
Alejandro FG was placed in “the whole assault section”, in addition to being the one who grabs him from behind by the neck. About him, he underlined his “coldness”. “He called everyone in the group to go to the San Diego park,” he said of the defendants’ subsequent meeting there.
About Catherine SB, he said, referring to the references in his defense being the youngest,It’s about “the sweet girl who has a toxic relationship with Diego MM and who shares his taste for violence.”
He also pointed out that not only the testimony of Samuel’s friend but also the images “corroborate” that he pushed her away when she tried to help him. “We see her in the group of attackers, entering and leaving.” “He avoided their help and defense, he participated from start to finish.”
Concerning Kaio ASC, the prosecutor defined him as “the one who thought he was the first in his class to go to the police”referring to the statement in which he accused two other defendants. The prosecutor denied that he was going to separate, as he stated, or that he was “a mere spectator of the events”, placing him instead as an “active participant”.
Finally, regarding Alejandro MR, he stated that was “the liar”“, in relation to the testimony he gave in his first statements then at trial. “For someone who is sporadic, they make a lot of calls,” he said about the exchanges between the accused after the events. “He is not yet, he is from where he comes from Diego M.”, he added to insist on his involvement.
