He 10 percent richer in the world He released Two -thirds belonging global warming has been produced since 1990 and is responsible for increase extreme climatic phenomena – like thermal waves and drought – obtained from the climatic crisis, according to a study published in Change in the climate of natureField
A study that assessed to which different groups and societies contributed to emissions shows that 1 percent belonging richer people in the world have contributed 26 times more than on average in the world before increase belonging Global thermal extremes And 17 times more in Amazon droughtField
Studies implemented by the University of ET Zurich (Switzerland) show the relationship between issues of issues based on income and climatic injuries, and shows that the consumption and investments of the rich have and have “disproportionate” effects on extreme meteorological phenomena.
The effects that are “especially serious in vulnerable tropical regions, such as the Amazon, South -East Asia and South Africa,” and historically contributed to a lesser extent into world emissions.
The study shows that Extraordinary climatic effects They are not only the result of abstract global emissions, but also “they can be directly related to Life and investment elections, which, in turn, are associated with wealth“Sarah Shongart emphasizes, explorer Eth Zurich and the main author of the investigation.
“We find that rich emitters play an important role in conducting climatic extremes,” and this “provides strong support for the climate policy, which indicates a reduction in their emissions,” says Schngart.
Critical imbalance
Using a modeling model that combined economic data and climatic modeling, researchers were able to track emissions of various world groups and evaluate their contribution to certain climatic extremes.
Thus, they found that the emissions of 10 percent of the richest people in the United States and China themselves, multiplied by two or three extreme temperatures in vulnerable regions.
“If everyone from afar as the poorest 50 percent of the world’s population, the warm-up of the planet would be minimal since 1990,” says Karl-Friedrich Schleussner, co-author of the study and director of the integrated research group on the climatic impact of IIASA.
“To fix this imbalance is crucial for fair and effective climatic actions,” the researcher says.
The study also emphasizes the importance of emissions related to financial investments, and claims that focusing on financial flows and wallets of high income people can report significant benefits for climate.
“The climatic action, which does not take into account the enormous responsibilities of the richest members of society, risks missing one of the most powerful levers that we must reduce future damage,” says Schleussner.
The authors believe that these conclusions can help in the implementation of progressive political tools aimed at social elites, and emphasize that the payment of rich pollutants can also provide the necessary support for adaptation and losses and damage in vulnerable countries.
To improve the responsibility for climatic actions in accordance with the real contribution to the “necessary” emissions not only for stopping global warming, “but also to achieve a more fair and sustainable world”, to conclude the authors.
With information EFE
