Liputan6.com, Jakarta Thing explosion On Monday, May 12, 2025, ammunition in the village of Sagara, Cibalong district, Garut Regency, Western Java expired, which caused 13 people to die of both civil society and TNI. They noted that four of them were members of the army.
About the tragedy, Civic society I also condemned the victims for the incident for the security sector reform. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the tragedy in Garut, where the inability of his investigation is the same as the inability to protect human rights, namely the right to live his victims.
The coalition consists of; IMARSIAL, YLBHI, CONTRAST, PBHI, Amnesty International Indonesia, Elsam, Human Law Working Group (HRWG), Walhi, Setara Institute, Center Initiative, Institute of Legal Aid (LBH) Jakart, Institute of Legal Aid (LBH), Legal Assistance (LBH). (ALDP), public virtue, institute for the reform of criminal judiciary (ICJR), Jakarta Independent newspaper Alliance (AJI), Association of Advocates of indigenous population (PPman), BEM SI, de jure.
“The coalition insisted on the Commission of the Chamber of Deputies to immediately create a team that explored this tragedy, except that the victims families would have the right to know what happened, also because on Wednesday it is necessary to supervise fatal equipment such as weapons, ammunition and explosives,” he said on Wednesday (4/225).
It was stated that if without strict supervision and comprehensive evaluation of DPR had to repeat the potential. Every process of murder manipulation, from production, distribution, after destruction must be in accordance with safety standards and are solved by those who are professional.
“If this is repeated and neglecting the state, then this incident can be classified as a violation of human rights, in particular about life rights, absolute rights that cannot be reduced under any conditions,” as stated.
The coalition said that the statement of TNI officials, who said civilians had become victims because they wanted to take metal fragments of ammunition was a claim that was in a hurry and was not sensitive to the feelings of the victim’s families, let alone before the results of a complex, impartial and transparent investigation.
“It seems that such a claim is accused by the victim to cover the institutional responsibility for the negligence that occurs,” he explained.