The Court of First Instance of Aoiz has decreed Provisional prison, communicated and without bail for the fairman detained in Huarte for an alleged crime of sexual assault on minors 16 years old. The judge detailed What is the attraction in which the sexual assaults occurred? and the circumstances in which they occurred.
So far there are nine complaints of touching filedwithout prejudice to the fact that as the investigation progresses, other victims of the criminal act under investigation may emerge, as indicated in the court order issued after being brought to justice.
Debates of investigation practiced, it appears that on Saturday September 21, the respondent, El Grillo Loco fairground attraction workerlocated in the Huarte Exhibition Parkdo touching girls under 16 on the legs, buttocks or breasts and blocked the attraction bar, not allowing them to get off.
In this regard, the judge adds that the version given by the complainantsin the name and in the representation of his daughters, “manifests itself, in a coherent manner, with a linear discourse in space-time, without any fallacious motive that could vitiate the statement.”
He emphasizes in this sense that The statements they made at the headquarters of the provincial police are consistent. and support the alleged commission of the facts by the person under investigation, with the precautions inherent in this phase of the investigation.
From all this, he concludes that the investigation “He touched the buttocks, thighs and breasts minors whose ages vary between 11 and 15 yearswith the desire or intention of satisfying one’s lustful desires.
The public prosecutor asked the pre-trial detention due to possible risk of abscondingto ensure the presence of the person under investigation at the trial, due to the seriousness of the facts, as well as to avoid criminal repetition in the interest of safeguarding and protecting minors. The lawyers of the People’s Prosecutor’s Office and the SAM adhered to this request, while the defense opposed it, alleging that there are other less onerous measures such as the restraining order.
Given the circumstances, andThe monitor understood that there was a risk of escape. In this regard, it is emphasized that The person investigated has no known address in Spainwhere, according to his account, he arrived in February 2024. He also lacks a family unit that could determine his roots.
Regarding his situation in Spain, it is noted that “there is no trace, but It appears that your administrative situation is irregular.not being determined, does not have an NIE or documents proving that his situation is regularized, claiming to only have a photo of his passport.”
In arguing his decision, the judge also took into account the nature of the fact and the severity of the sentence, since may be punished with a prison sentence of 2 to 6 years. So far there are nine complaints, which means there are nine criminal acts.
For all this, he concludes that pretrial detention is an appropriate measurewhich is not disproportionate and which adequately achieves the intended objectives.
