The implementation of the Federal Criminal Code (CPPF) in Caba is not a legal reform, but a historical and impossible transformation. From August 11, 2025, the federal jurisdiction of Komorodo P.Yu and an economic criminal will accept this indictment, already successful in such provinces as Salta, Jujuy, Mendoza, Rosario and several more jurisdictions in the country. This model demonstrated real effectiveness in resolving complex causes of illegal drug trafficking, organized crime and corruption, much less time and with greater transparency and participation of citizens.
A specific experience demonstrates that the accusation is not only possible, but also urgently and is necessary to achieve more flexible, transparent and, above all, fair justice. And the regime is a total of, because the implementation of the isolated rules that were made left us a hybrid, outdated and ineffective code that urgently needs a complete, general and systematic replacement of CPPF.
The effectiveness and speed of the new system implies not a decrease in guarantees, but its strengthening. The accused has clear rules of the game, in conditions of discretion, contradictions and equal weapons. He knows about many other things from the lips of the judge and without intermediaries, the fate that affects him without his requests and discussions that are lost in the system – now a computer – which systematically hides the brightness and communicative strictness of the court decision. The victims, meanwhile, are actively involved, they can request a revision of measures, without even plain, formulate the prosecution, continue the criminal process if the prosecutor is surrendered and intervened in decisions on alternative measures.
The indictment is based on the idea of conception of crime as a social conflict, returning fame to the author and the victim and privileged their interests over any state utility claims in Sobrogat in them. The vast majority of cases are resolved by alternative agreements or exits, which humanizes and sets the state reaction to a crime.
The accused and the victim sees the solution to his problem much more predictable, flat, fast and effective. The idea of general and individual prevention also wins.
The implementation of the indictment in Argentina is not an experiment or fashion. This is part of a consolidated global trend. In America, countries such as the United States, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Costa -Kosta and most of Central America have already accepted complete accusations. Europe also reflects this evolution: Italy reformed its criminal processes against the adversarial system, while Spain, France, Germany and Portugal included indictment.
Among the main advantages, a clear separation of functions between judges and prosecutors (in addition to getting rid of evidence and management of the agenda of the day) and greater normative compatibility with conventional guarantees of citizens is established. With the current Code, restrictive measures of rights and freedoms (raids, listening, opening a phone, mail, etc.) and a decision on the implication of someone is made unilaterally by judges who retain a direct or indirect direction of the investigation (and, therefore, they are recovering). In the new script, it is precisely the prosecutors who investigate and accuse, while judges control them without any functional obligations to this task, guaranteeing a fair and fair process. Judges make judges, and the rest between the prosecutor and the defense is restored. Thus, the oral and state audience replaces the old written and bureaucratic paradigm, now hidden in a very practical and outdated computer system, providing justice to citizens and restoring their confidence in institutions.
The system represents a new main character: prosecutor. This should be a flexible, prepared and effective trial for strategic research and judgment skills. In addition, it is important that it be the same in all cases of the process to ensure coherence and effectiveness in criminal prosecution. You can no longer transfer the case to another colleague in order to correct or make decisions in a different sense than he achieved with great work, imputation of the case.
Thus, CPPF puts it in the center of the criminal process as the owner of the action responsible for the investigation, accusation and guaranteeing the success of the system. Therefore, there is no possible model of the indictment without an effective, prepared, active, professional and modern public ministry. This requires much more than appointment: this implies the professionalization of paintings, work in interdisciplinary teams, strategic planning of criminal prosecution, formulating with other agencies and improving management. The fiscal function requires leadership, independence and institutional vision, committed by the legality and human rights, as well as internal cases of constant control and teamwork. The matter cannot rely on the discretion and lonely decision of the prosecutor.
The prosecutors are ready for trial, with oral training, negotiations and processing the hearings, so urgently overcome the internal disorganization of MPF, as well as guarantee a unique, transparent and affordable file management system. But also private lawyers. Education is mandatory, urgent and necessary for all operators of federal jurisdiction, despite their praise and recognized opportunities. And the trial fair is also important. Protection and complaint should have access in real time to information about the case, and this does not require large investments or complex technological developments: it is simple and can be quickly implemented if the system operators are heard.
The alleged absence of resources or disability for this reform is not an excuse, because the indictment does not require – as is usually considered incorrect – a huge infrastructure or a continuation of impossible resources. In fact, it defines much less than the formalized and bureaucratic system of deformation, agreements and the happy disappearance of the processed car and the NULLITIES festival (with the success coefficient – tin is constantly proven).
In practice, the preliminary audience is simple and can be resolved with minimal technologies: there is enough computer and Internet connection. Most of them are methods among the parties; They do not require immediacy and can be practiced practically. Even university students effectively perform them in academic contests of trials after only months of preparation, demonstrating that the application of the model of the indictment does not require sophistication, and devotion and goodwill, abundant qualities among residents of good deeds, which, I confirm, have many federal courts.
An insanely repeating displacement is refuted by examinations conducted by irrefutable agencies that the reform process in Argentina is more seriously considered: Comodoro Py manages about 6,671 annual reasons with more than one thousand judicial officials, which gives a very controlled average value of 6.6 reasons for the year. If only prosecutors (about 60) are considered, the relationship is approximately 111 annual reasons per prosecutor, an indicator that is additionally reduced by the inclusion of tax assistants, leaving 49 annual reasons for one trial, in just four monthly cases.
These figures clearly demonstrate that there is no risk of saturation and that the implementation of the indictment is absolutely viable, especially taking into account the fact that most of the reasons are already delegated in MPF without generating, in fact, functional collapses even under a mixed and formalized model.
As a closure, it is important to move on to the implementation of jury in federal jurisdiction, which is a natural addition to the model of the indictment. This mechanism provides absolute democratic legitimacy, transparency and more human, impartial and close to a common citizen. In addition, the current methods of trial, examination, exam and counter-disturbance, objections and theory of case, specially designed for jurors, are a more pure expression of the indictment.
The main task is to expand the system to the oil crimes that process in Caba, since maintaining a double system between National and Buenos Aires Justice prevents the complete implementation of the accusation model. National justice needs urgent reorganization, which allows you to coordinate and respect the autonomy of Buenos -Aires. Similarly, although I have surpassed my own, it is also necessary that the competitive model extends to other material powers, including civil justice, since its logic cheers and conflict resolution ensured advantages that surpass criminal cases.
And the last, but no less important, nobility obliges the political courage and technical value of the Ministry of Justice of the nation and especially its owner of my colleague, Dr. Mariano Kuneo Libarona (probably one of the criminal sides with great experience and the most recognized). His firm decision on the implementation of the indictment in the institutional heart of the Argentine judicial power against historical forecasts and resistance reflects energy, planning and commitment, worthy of celebration.
Mariano Cneo Libarona, Minister of Judge of the Nation.
This change is no longer optional, but an urgent democratic and constitutional obligation, which those who judge (and teach) were promoted for years. The accusatory system arrives to stay, and is already a reality throughout America. Those of us who believe in better justice – and work every day to do this possible – we were waiting for this, and, as citizens of good, we affirm this.