I am a woman and I would have liked Kamala to be elected, with her dark Chloe suits and her gross instrumentalization of feminism (I don’t think that American ladies identify in the least with your proposal), with the underprivileged (especially them) and with the color of their skin. All obscene phenomena, even if in politics there is nothing left to not obscene.
However, believe me, I’m glad that Trump is out and I loved watching him dance cwith his red tie swinging on both sides of his very powerful comical belly.
I like Kamala, but I had a hard time believing her (as I have a hard time believing any of the others). priests and sisters of the world), especially since it is difficult for me to believe Trump. I mean the reasons why they operate, beyond the pursuit of power and the satisfaction of a dislocated ego. Men and women. What difference does it make?
Was Kamala’s candidacy a lame attempt to respond to a diversity quota where was legitimate for his merits? Kamala Harris, like any candidate, faced a complicated path to the presidency, much worse if she is a woman: what will she have done to get there? Or better yet, what hasn’t he done?
Let it be known that I want (and if I could I would demand it) a woman president (in any more or less civilized country); but what culture brought us woke up in what became after his magnificent intentions, It is an erratic denial of reality, starting with the signs of identity of different peoples to equalize, homogenize. Then excommunication for dissent, but you have to disagree.
Because, friends, Putting a black lady to represent Anne Boleyn is a lack of respect for black culture, where the emphasis is also placed on the worst, through compensatory boasting, emphasizing the fact (which is only in their paranoid heads) that being black would be a bad thing, or that black people have no history.
There is nothing egalitarian or inclusive about black, gay, and female imitations of the hegemonic. Let us remember the wokazo Roald Dahl, author of stories such as Mathilde And Charlie and the factory chocolate when the Puffin publishing house hired “sensitive” (neurotic) readers and rewriters (the new profession cool) correcting the writer’s books based on what they (people like Kamala Harris) consider virtuous and educational in the 21st century. Not really literary, deeply illiberal (and a little short) authorities who are fighting to usher in a new era, where they control not only what we do but what we think.
In Kamala’s cosmogony, you can’t say ugly in a novel. No! The words white or black and, in defense of sanity, “crazy” or any of its synonyms will also not be used. Come on, we can’t talk about mental pathology in a book except by using circumlocutions or elliptical constructions, absolutely crazy!
I’ll tell you more… The triumph of Trump, which is a intolerable steamroller who seduces with his psychopathy the most animal part of the brain (this man whose only two hobbies are the lack and the American struggle), speaks of a very large American population absolutely primitive and delayed. I’m not talking about mental retardation, which is everywhere, I’m talking about human retardation. The opposite of social, political and moral evolution in which a growth in the values of the human community such as altruism, concern for knowledge is presupposed… And these little things…
I imagine Trump laughing out loud dressed as Santa (and Barron with a cutout by the White House). And yet, I am happy with your choice. and I love it less harmful that he Kamalazo, willing to destroy the rights of free thinkers in a totalitarianism infinitely more effective and implacable than the worst predictions of Orwell and Asimov.
