The City Council of Valencia resorts to a thousand euros sanction, imposed by the court on the mayor and leader of the PP, Maria Jose Katala, for the administration’s obstacle to investigate the exams of the local police dome. The consistory asks that the judicial resolution will be canceled that the controversial number 5 of Valencia has risen for the mayor – as responsibility for the local corporation – for the delay in sending the full files of evidence for the main commissars held in October 2023, which were convicted for a year and a half.
The Katala team also claims that it is not allowed to authorize the mayor for the action of the corporation, which has its own legal identity. That is, in any case, the fine must be adopted by the city council, not a leader. In the appeal, to which Eldiario.es had access, legal services of the consistory are considering disproportionate sanction, they claim that the documentation was sent, and they note that the previous hearing process was not provided. “This leads to any unacceptable point in order to send the mayor of the city responsibility, a derivative of late compliance with the obligation to remission of the administrative file, which in accordance with the legal mandate corresponds to the corporation itself,” the municipal lawyer says.
Sports, who claims to be fully documented on exams and estimates for several months, agreed to violate the rights of applicants on April 16 and postpone the judicial procedure. The judge pointed to the car that for months they drove “without a procedure for continuing the submission of an administrative file” by a consistory and aphorizing the “especially rooted behavior” of the city council, because, as, “with it, they prevent the continuation of this procedure, violating the right to effective judicial protection” commissars who condemned evidence and administrative acts and administrative acts. The headquarters of the local police and the city council has long been given the court for several months, sending incomplete files, despite the constant requirements.
This court will regulate the validity of the agreement of the local government, which rejected the appeal against the police resolution with the results of the electoral process. Four Commissioners announced the examination of the exam and challenged the procedure in the city council, discovering the inconsistent, but the consistory rejected it. Improvement tests, which include a temporary bag and promotion of the category, were repeated after the call of an authorized person who had already resigned, who brought the case to the Supreme Court. From this investigation of the process of administrative selection, two complaints filed by two commanders suspended against part of the body of the body, members of the court were looking for the fact that they allegedly weakened the results to bring the commissioners associated with them and rise to their main commissars. This is the maximum step of the local police, half a dozen places with salaries, which are about 100,000 euros.
After several warnings to the city council of Valencia, the court asked the official responsible for the fact that he did not send full files, which include the work presented and exposed by the commissars and the registration of emails that accredited their deposit. Legal services indicated a mass agent, which was subsequently delodomed on charges, and, finally, in a separate part, he initiated the sanctioning procedure against the mayor himself as responsible for the local administration. Only in the first week of April on the eve of the retirement of the police chief, against whom the complaints were sent and the friends by the selection court, when the consistory sent emails with the works set forth by the authorized exam, after the control submitted a letter in court accusing the then police chief of criticizing the Obstacles of justice.
The city council protects that the work was not evaluated
During the appeal, the consistory supports protection, which performs the already former head of the local police, Jose Vicent Errera, indicating that the work set forth by the commissars was not part of the file, although these presentations are in the protocols provided by the recordings. “An expression of an authorizing nature that contains a lack of a fund, since part of the premise – incomplete conduct of an administrative file is not true,” says an appeal who is blitted by a judge who in her car addresses the issue “in excessively vague terms”.
The consistory insists that he sent the documentation if necessary, that the work was not part of the file and that the investigation was not postponed, which was carried out for a year and a half. The City Council began spring documentation on evidence on August 29, 2024, having received the first requirement for compliance with the file, which is carried out on December 13, 2024, is repeated on January 16 and 24, 2025, when he gave the order to send more materials without request, according to the notes.
In this regard, the municipal lawyer defends the “Documentary Film, the contribution of which in the recording demanded that the repetition is not part of the administrative file,” because the grounds for the call concerned the oral impact. The defense of the corporation insists that “the subsequent holding of the applicants from the aforementioned presentations from the aforementioned presentations, as soon as the selective procedure completed by e -mail, does not change its legal character, since what was supposed to evaluate the selection body was, apparently, the oral intervention of the participant, and not the aforementioned presentation.”
They also indicate that “a great contribution of exercises (read the presentations in Power Point) and emails sent to the headquarters of the local police, accredited by its delivery and the date of remission, in no way prevented the judicial persecution of the procedure.”
In the protocols presented by the headquarters to protect assessments, also analyzed in the procedure, it is noted that the work was postponed during the exam. Subsequently, the documentation said that the court did not request them until several days after the evidence and that the notes were made before they performed all the work in their hands. In addition, the commissar, who best scored in the test, who personally makes his work, without providing records, and not by e -mail as the remaining seven.
According to the documentation, to which the Eldiario.es had access, the headquarters approved eight applicants in the presentation in which they supported their exhibition, the last phase of the test and in which half was suspended two days after the exam. The tests were carried out on October 4, the work was requested on the 6th, and the notes were published in the manner of October 11 from the 10th day without the possibility of consideration. Not all the work that supported the evaluated presentations has not yet been delivered, as indicated in emails that prove that several applicants did not carry out work until October 13 and 18.
