He Vox parliamentary group asked the Table of the Parliament of Navarre that “he reconsiders his decision, adopted during the meeting of September 30, and notified to the group on October 3, if he does not consider it appropriate” deal with a Vox motion on illegal immigration.
As Vox explains in a press release, the reason indicated in the agreement not to deal with the motion -that its content “violates the dignity of people and could constitute a alleged hate crime“-, has no basis” because “this presupposes a criminal offense as to what constitutes a position and a political initiative, which, moreover, is nothing new, since it is a question of one of the fundamental positions of the Vox political party since its creation.
It is good to remember that This request was brought before the prosecution by the PSNwhose spokesperson in Parliament, Ramón Alzórriz, filed a complaint last week believing that this could constitute a hate crime, in accordance with article 510 of the Penal Code.
From Voice criticized the fact that “the political forces which dominate the Table and the Council of Spokespeople prefer violate the rights of parliamentariansand therefore of all the citizens represented by the Vox parliamentary group in Navarre, through the false and fallacious imputation of a hate crime.”
“What must be denounced is the obvious lack of application of democratic criteria within the Council of Spokespersons itself. prevent essential political activity parliamentarians,” they added.
Vox Navarre considers that “the arbitrary nature of this decision is presented with the comparison of performances in other parliaments”, taking into account that “The same initiative was presented in all the autonomous parliaments of Spain, that of Navarra being the only one where it was rejected.“And this,” he said, “without any court having declared that the initiative could constitute a crime or an attack on a fundamental right.”
He Navarrese parliamentary group stated that “the impact on parliamentary activity that results from the decision is of such magnitude that, since the reason why it is inadmissible has no basis, the decision violates article 23 of the Spanish Constitution “, since it implies “an unbearable limitation on the exercise of political participation requesting parliamentarians and, by extension, the citizens they represent.
