Sofia Suescun, Kiko Jimenez And Maite Galdeano They have become this summer the magic trident of television entertainment. With the end of the soap opera between Alvaro Muñoz Escassi And Maria Jose SuarezTelevision needed new protagonists to fill its sincere programs and, suddenly, this melodrama appears shakespearean very cani
The world of the heart is wonderful: you don’t have to work, you have to invent. When fame begins to fade and the billing model becomes exhausted, some resort to tactics that, although controversial, seem to work: invent or exaggerate conflicts to stay up to date.
As you point out Alessandro Lecquio“This whole conflict, look where it is, is happening to them at the most opportune moment.” In a panorama where Sofia is no longer the undisputed star of the realities -with its image somewhat degraded after its passage Survivors All Stars- This family drama allowed him, his mother and his partner to revive media interest. It is no coincidence that, at the very moment when his career seemed to be calming down, such a media story exploded.
There is no denying that family dramas have based on real events. But what seems clear, according to Lecquio and many other commentators, is that all the actors involved are taking advantage of the situation. “The problem is that they are making a theater out of almost everything,” says the Italian, suggesting that, even if the conflict has an authentic background, it has been dramatized to maximize its impact.
The controversy broke out when Maite Galdeano revealed on social media that her daughter Sofía had kicked her out of the house, accusing Kiko Jiménez of manipulating her. From there, entertainment programs focused on breaking down every detail of this story. It is not surprising that those involved received large sums of money for their interventions. As reported, Sofia received 80,000 euros for his statements on television, while Maite got 20,000 euros for their participation.
These types of situations, where family or personal conflicts are exploited in great detail, reflect the way in which heartthrobs find a source of income in controversy when their careers begin to falter. “Mothers-in-law are a lottery,” joked one commentator, suggesting that Maite knew exactly what she was getting into and that her main goal was none other than to to stir up controversy and, with it, money.
The sets have been transformed into real stages where these media dramas take place and where the public, conscious or not, behaves as spectators of a work that seems to have no end. Every week, new statements, confrontations and revelations follow one another, keeping the public and the protagonists in suspense. pocketing juicy sums of money.
The most curious thing about this whole phenomenon is that, even though the context of many of these stories may contain some truth, many of them are constructed or exaggerated with a clear objective: to generate income. The public seems to appreciate these stories, even knowing that many of them are embellished or even invented. Are vision strugglewhere we know that the blows are fictitious and, despite this, they take advantage of each blow, each slap, each of the falls to ring. And when the opponent gets up from the canvas, we start again.
The cycle is simple: conflict is created, exclusivity is sold, and then the consequences are drawn out in an endless chain of interviews and talk shows. But what does this say about our society? What are we consuming when we sit down to watch these kinds of shows? Perhaps it’s time to ask whether this type of entertainment actually delivers anything beyond momentary distraction.
The case of Sofía Suescun, Kiko Jiménez and Maite Galdeano is just one example of a pattern that seems to repeat itself too often in the world of the heart. When job opportunities dwindle, family drama and fabricated or exaggerated stories become a profitable strategy. For some, it is simply the cost of staying current; for others, it is an example of how the audience also plays its part, applauding and consuming these spectacles, thus contributing to the perpetuation of this cycle.
Let’s not forget that behind every TV series there is a real life. And while bank account numbers may increase, online blows damage skin and cause bruises. Many people have ended up emotionally broken on television, and it’s time to ask ourselves if we still want to applaud that. circus of blows and betrayals.
