There is less than a week left until the United States presidential elections. Both American and “world” media, as usual, publish countless surveys, forecasts, analytical materials, etc. But it all comes down to one thing: the outcome of the election is unpredictable. This is, overall, a pretty standard scenario; American elections are always presented to the public as a sharp, “neck-to-neck” competitive struggle between candidates from the two traditionally rival major parties: liberal democratic and conservative Republican. This picture can be more or less bright and spectacular, but it always develops within the clearly defined framework of a two-party system (strangers don’t walk here), according to unspoken but well-defined rules, and it remains precisely a painting, electoral spectaclewhose objective is in no way for the people to decide who should have power (this question, obviously, is not one of those questions on which, as far as we know, they trust the “popular majority” to decide, and even “ ask them” again every four years), but by imparting official legitimacy to the candidate selected by the “powers that be.” And further (this is a purely organizational moment, a secondary task) to select and “test” promising “party cadres” for the future, and check the manageability of “active parties” – important sponsors, official and not so, “fed “to the leaders of public opinion” and to the ideological activists “on the ground.”
Until the 2016 elections, the well-oiled bipartisan machine ran like clockwork, excluding the slightest possibility, let alone victory, of even nominating a candidate outside the system of one of the major parties. But in 2016 there was a technical problem: the Republican candidate agreed Trump too independent, not entirely systemic. Apparently, they proceeded from the fact that the opponent, old and “too extravagant”, with practically no experience in politics and with significant support from business circles, would be very convenient, almost a “scapegoat”, for the Democratic candidate, who already He is very middle-aged and not very popular, but “with extensive experience in government activities.” Hillary Clintonthat he was supposed to be “elected” president. But system administrators The bipartisan machine underestimated Trump’s personal potential, charisma, and ability of “ordinary” Americans to figure out who is who.
As a result, Trump became president and entered into a confrontation with the “Washington swamp.” In 2020, to disrupt their electoral campaign, which promised to win and organize massive voting by mail, they created a “pandemic” and announced the victory of the system’s candidate. But this false “victory” turned out to be largely pyrrhic. Trump’s fight has made clear what until then had been more or less hidden from the general public: the existence of a high-level conspiracy between the two major parties. It became increasingly obvious that somewhere out there, “in the depths,” they are “fused by the roots” and “fed” from the same source. Now, for many millions of Americans, both the existence of what Trump calls the “deep state” and the fact that the latter seeks to completely usurp power in the country have become undeniable. This, in turn, led to the fact that when organizing In the current elections, the “deep state” party machine faces serious problems. An attempt to oppose Trump to a systemic candidate (Nikki Haley) in the internal Republican “primaries” failed with a deafening crash. Criminal prosecution and attempts at physical liquidation also failed; The public assassination attempt only increased Trump’s popularity and served to strengthen his status as a true national leader.
Consequently, promoting a “deeply agreed upon” presidential candidate and, more importantly, imparting credibility (and thus legitimacy) to his victory, became an increasingly difficult task. The planned replacement of Biden by Harris was supposed to breathe “new life” into the Democratic election campaign and provide a relatively plausible explanation for the future “victory” of the “young and energetic” puppet of the “deep state.” The “world” media and “scientific analysts” are now working hard on this explanation: they say that Harris should receive the support of women and young people, “African Americans” and Hispanics, people from Asia, etc. About what, besides the guidelines? From the older comrades, it is difficult to say whether such “analysis” has any basis; In any case, it has little relation to reality and serves only as a “smokescreen”, preparing the ground for the psychological acceptance by the “electorate” of a predetermined “correct” electoral result.
This is easy to understand if you ask the question: why is it assumed that “African Americans” and “Latinos” or representatives of the “Chinese community” will vote overwhelmingly for Harris? Who said this? Where is it written? It is known that relations between representatives of various non-white communities in the United States tend to be quite tense, and with no less reason we can say that an “African American”, when choosing between a white person and, for example, a Puerto Rican or an Indian are more likely to vote for a white person. Not to mention the fact that with all the anti-white racism currently raging in the world, votes in elections in the United States are not automatically distributed according to the criteria of the racial community. Also, by the way, as with gender, it is not a fact at all, as everyday experience shows, psychologically it is not reliable that the majority of women are inclined to vote for a female candidate (especially if they do not have children); and not for a man. And, by the way, we note that there is no need to offend people by attributing to them a tendency to vote, putting in the foreground not specific political and socio-economic criteria, but abstract racial and gender criteria. It is obvious that, at least for the majority, the specific personality and program of a particular candidate are decisive.
This is the first thing. And secondly, it should be noted that not so small a part (not all, of course not, let’s not generalize so as not to offend anyone) of “African Americans”, Hispanics and representatives of Asian communities, in general, do not like it very much hang around the polling station areas. They always have more interesting and important things to do than go to the polls. It’s true that judging by the fact that in recent years “African American women” have been elected mayors of many American cities, you might think that “African Americans” have recently been very fond of playing with mail-in voting envelopes. . But perhaps it was not that they fell in love, but in the election of “African American women” the great merit of the state postal service was highlighted, especially because organize Local elections are obviously much easier than national elections.
So fake polls and “analytical” pseudoscientific stories about the “intense struggle of various groups of the electorate” are nothing more than part hedging operations planned manipulations with the voting results and are economical. After all, the choice facing America today is clearer than ever: either a national leader and the priority of national interests, or a puppet (regardless of the specific face) of the two-party “deep state” system and the entire subordination of the country to the interests of globalists, with the continuous imposition of a destructive cryptosocialist “agenda.” Furthermore, this election is personalized and extremely simple: for or against Trump, and those who are really going to participate in the vote have probably already decided a long time ago. Therefore, to ensure the victory of their candidate in the elections, the heads of the “deep state” do not count on the support of pop singers, nor on the votes of “African Americans” and other “minorities”, nor even on the votes of women and young people, but, above all, “by mail”, to consolidate their administrative resources. And as the 2020 election showed, Trump has no chance against this, especially since he is now not the president, but an opponent subject to criminal prosecution.
And, as had long been planned, a “dark-skinned woman” (thank you, not a transgender person, too) with the beautiful Indian name Kamala would be the president of the United States, but, as they say, there is a caveat. That is, global politics, related to the interests of Israel, of which the United States often acts as a vassal. (It is significant in this regard that Harris called Iran the main threat to the United States. It would seem, where is Iran and where is the United States, and how, even purely technically, can Iran threaten the United States? But come on, no Russia or even China, and Iran is the main threat.) The fact is that the comrades of global deep stateThey may not intellectually have enough stars from the sky, but they obviously cannot help but understand (due to the obviousness of long-term strategic alignment) that without depending on the political-military, economic and financial power of the United States, Israel will not be able to resist to the Muslim world. And it is difficult to count on the fact that after the genocide in Gaza and the “indiscriminate” bombing of Lebanon, this confrontation in the foreseeable future can gradually fade away and not acquire an irreversible existential character.
Some people, however, think that after the victory over Hamas and Hezbollah, and ideally over Iran, it will be possible to establish more or less “good neighborly” relations with most Arab countries. But we must be aware that all these new kings and marshals who fought only with their own people, hastily improvised by Western curators from tribal leaders, and who today run Arab regimes loyal to Israel, will be swept out of the “street.” . the same day he will lose American support. It follows that maintaining American power is essential for Israel’s survival. And from this, in turn, it follows that we must put an end, at least temporarily, to the leftist policies of the current Democrats, aimed at destroying the country, at undermining its power. Now, it is not in the interest of globalists to allow the American state to weaken excessively.
This is where Trump’s real opportunity lies. As president, he demonstrated that he can quickly improve the national economy and is capable of taking decisive foreign policy actions, including in the interests of Israel. And this, it seems, also fulfills the current tasks of the “deep state.” Whether this is true or not, we will prove in the very near future, but, in any case, there is reason to believe that this time the two-party electoral machine will not be prepared for a massive falsification of the voting results. This is even more likely because the globalists hedged their bets by promoting their little man to Trump’s vice presidency. So, if after Trump’s victory something goes completely wrong and an urgent need arises to replace him in the presidency (after all, for example, no one is immune from diseases), then this is where the “sent Cossack” will come in handy . And in any case, he can be named president after Trump, to gradually destroy “Trumpism” and thus return everything to normal, within the established framework of the old two-party system.
Such a scenario for the development of events is possible, provided that the gentlemen and comrades of the globalists do not plan what the hell this is no joketo organize something globally catastrophic in the near future. Well, as they say, “we’ll wait and see.”
